« Another Ex-Liberal Comes Clean: Our Cultural Surge is Working | Main | Oops, Sorry. Opening Lane 2 Now: The Off-Topic Thread »
March 12, 2008
UPDATE: Eliot Spitzer Resigns, Still Doesn't Say What He Did
This is technically a news story, but since I have a VERY strong opinion on it, I'm pushing it over here on the right side of the aisle.
After watching the Governor of New York humiliate his wife and apologize for what one might call "unspoken sins" yesterday, today we got to watch him hold yet another late press conference, in which he answered no questions, but apologized and resigned.
Eliot Spitzer, in a wistful statement, referred only to his "private failings" (we assume he is referring to his frequent flier status with high-class hookers; money-laundering really wouldn't qualify as "private") without explaining what they were. He lamented his inability to fulfill his own promise as the governor of New York, evoking nothing so much as Mrs. Clinton's recent tearful sorrow at the thought that she might not be able to serve us as president.
It was yet another non-apologetic apology from a public figure only sorry he was caught doing something he had convinced himself he could get away with. He claimed to be holding himself accountable, in the same way he had insisted others do when he was the one chasing them down. What he failed to do was apologize to all the people whose lives he hypocritically destroyed, while enthusiastically engaging in the same behavior he was ruining them for.
When will the public tire of these self-aggrandizing philanderers, thieves, and neer-do-wells whose only regret is that they couldn't "serve the public" longer or better? When will they learn that we don't need their magnanimity to survive our miserable lives as the vast American public?
Eliot Spitzer didn't deserve to be governor, though he has convinced himself that the people deserved him to be. In this--as, apparently, in many things in his life--he has deluded himself and hoodwinked the public. Were there justice to be had in this instance, it would be that Mr. Spitzer would be quickly divorced by his wife who would then become very very rich; be prosecuted for his indiscretions--all of them, whatever they may be, and not just the dribs and drabs he is willing to admit to (if he ever is)--with all the zeal he exhibited in going after stockbrokers and CEOs; and removed from the public discourse until he appears in the obituary column under the heading "Disgraced New York governor dies in prison."
But this is America. No doubt, he will have an epiphany of some sort (right now he's Jewish; he could learn to take it seriously or pick something else to convincingly convert to); act very sorry and noble; write a book all about how tortured he was all those years while he was betraying his wife and playing "naughty schoolboy and mean headmistress" with high-priced hookers; reveal himself to be gay, bisexual, a transvestite, or perhaps merely a "perverted American,"; go on Oprah to publicly repent while raking in book bucks; and sail blithely on. Within about a two-year period.
I hope I am wrong; but in our current America, I fear I am merely prescient.
Nonetheless, it is to be hoped that he withdraws from the public eye longer than Jesse Jackson did when he fathered an illegitimate baby (one week, if I recall correctly) or than Bill Clinton did when he was caught dipping his pen in the company intern (about three minutes.)
We, the American public, weary of the antics of the powerful and the morally bankrupt. We would like them to do the jobs we hire them for, not indulge their perverse fantasies on the public dime. If Eliot Spitzer wants to commit felonies, let him get a job where he doesn't have to scold so many felons. If he wants to launder money, let him join the Mafia or move to the Cayman Islands.
We have had enough of him.
Posted by Kerry at March 12, 2008 03:04 PM
Copyright © 2007 by author. May not be copied, published, or otherwise used (except for brief quotes) without express permission of author. Articles published with permission by Pardon My English.
-->Comments
Almost 4000 dead Americans in the Iraq Occupation, failing US dollar, recession.
And what's the right-wing's preoccupation?
SEX SCANDAL!
Posted by art6sec3
at March 13, 2008 10:26 AM
A63,
Since there is nothing substantially related to this topic in the previous post, further discussion of it will not take place.
If you want to talk about Eliot Spitzer, please, feel free. If you want to discuss the war in some fashion, I would suggest you relate it to the discussion of the culture surge on the left side of the page, since it does make mention of the war.
By the way, this is hardly an "obsession" of the "right wing." There are many more Democrats in New York than Republicans, and they all want him to leave.
Posted by Kerry
at March 13, 2008 12:10 PM
Also, you may have missed it, but there is an "off-topic thread" on the right side of the page where your war/economy discussion would fit just fine. See you there.
Posted by Kerry
at March 13, 2008 12:11 PM
By the way, this is hardly an "obsession" of the "right wing." There are many more Democrats in New York than Republicans, and they all want him to leave.
Wanting him to leave and obsessing about it are two different things. I have a feeling there are more conservative blogs talking about Spitzer's indiscretions than there are liberal ones. And I suspect this will become a conservative posterboy for years to come. Even though what Guiliani and Newt have equally colorful private lives.
Posted by ahmanrah
at March 13, 2008 01:33 PM
It's funny. I've been away from PME long enough that I somehow convinced myself that when I visited here, Kerry et al would be criticizing this stupid general reaction to Spitzer on principle (remember how she defended Larry Craig?) But that was stupid of me; I forgot that Spitzer was a democrat. I mean, jesus people, this was straight sex with a female hooker, no diapers or meth, no misappropriated funds, nothing to do with government business. If he hadn't been so zealous about busting ho houses in the past, he would be clean in my book. But it's not like he was supporting a War on Ho's (or a Defense of Marriage Act). Ah well, whatever.
Posted by Some Fella
at March 14, 2008 06:47 PM
Note: Comments once posted become the property of Pardon My English. We therefore reserve the right to make use of such in any manner and for whatever purpose we deem appropriate. Please refer to comment policy for further information.


