« Pandering to Criminals: OJ Says, “I Did It…NOT!” | Main | Kofi's Biggest Regret: Saddam's Rape Rooms Are Closed »

November 20, 2006

Importing Socialists

It’s funny how the conclusion of an election can completely alter media reportage. The day after the Democrat Public Relations Arm (DPRA) – euphemistically known as the “mainstream media” – got its party elected, they actually started broaching a couple of real issues. Such as amnesty for illegal aliens.

In my election piece I warned that Democrat ascendancy would mean a full court press to grant amnesty-by-another-name to illegals. And I retired election night as one of the voices in the darkness, emitting admonitions that a 420-foot-diameter SETI dish would have had trouble detecting amidst the talking-head static. I awakened to a world in which it seemed that the DPRA couldn’t talk enough about the aliens who have landed and how they would be allowed to stay. Writing at Forbes.com, Laurie Kellman said,

Bush could see one victory come his way under the new Democratic-controlled House - on immigration reform. The Republican-led House balked at Bush's plans for a guest worker program and for the Senate's plan for creating a path toward citizenship for millions of undocumented workers. Democrats tended to favor it.

Funny, though, why wasn’t the DPRA telling you about this before the election? Could it be that there was something they didn’t want you to know? Is it that they wanted you to focus more on Foley than immigration folly? More on the preacher Haggard than the haggard face of America? Ah, me and my flights of fancy.

A cursory examination of election statistics sheds light on why the DPRA kept the invasion of America off the radar screen. If you look at the groups that constitute 85 percent of legal immigrants and virtually all illegal ones – those of Third World ancestry – you’ll see that they supported the DPRA’s candidates by overwhelming margins.

Black voters led the pack, voting Democrat by an 89 percent to 11 percent margin. More ominously, Hispanics, the largest minority and by far the fastest growing immigrant group, went Democrat 70 percent to 30 percent. Asians were right behind, pulling the “D” lever 68 percent of the time. In contrast, whites once again gave the nod to Republicans, albeit by the slim margin of 52 percent to 48 percent.

This brings us to something that is usually left unsaid, despite being an ever more weighty millstone around the neck of a traditionalist movement frantically treading water. Liberals are importing their voters.

Do you understand the gravity of what I just told you? Let’s examine some more statistics.

When the Immigration Reform Act of 1965 (it created the situation wherein 85 percent of immigrants hail from the Third World. Gracias, Ted Kennedy) was passed, white people were 89 percent of the U.S. population. After four decades of culture-jarring migration, however, whites constitute only 69 percent of the nation. And unless our misbegotten immigration policies undergo radical change, this trend will continue unabated.

This is why I can only shake my head and register a Mona Lisa smile when I hear commentators such as Rush Limbaugh and Michael Savage assert that the Republicans lost because they abandoned conservative principles. This is only partly true. To illuminate the picture entirely, we have to ask why conservatives were ignored.

This isn’t rocket science. While the issue is multifaceted, the fact is that the constituency that has been keeping the traditionalist movement afloat is steadily losing population share. And lower population share equals less clout. Is it any wonder then that Bill Clinton said that he can’t wait for the day when whites are a minority in America?

The truth is that one has to be blind to miss the writing on the wall. On election night, Pat Robertson interviewed pollster John Zogby and registered surprise that Arizona, the “state of Barry Goldwater,” would lean left the way it did this election. Zogby quickly interjected, pointing out that due to “demographic changes” Arizona is no longer the conservative state it once was.

Of course, “demographic changes” is a euphemistic way of referring to an influx of socialist-minded third worlders, a population shift that has transformed erstwhile conservative bastions into liberal strongholds. Understanding this, John Zogby mentioned that Arizona and Virginia were the next “fifty/fifty states,” alluding to the fact that liberals’ numbers will soon equal those of conservatives. The funny thing about fifty/fifty, though, is that it’s not a destination but a point on a journey. And if you want to know what lies just a few stops down the road, look at California (does it bother anyone else that the governor of the most populous state has a foreign accent?).

Once a state whose politics was epitomized by Ronald Reagan, it has mutated into a polyglot cauldron of multiculturalism, with Nancy Pelosi as its political poster girl. Speaking of the Gipper, do you remember his landslide re-election victory in 1984? Running against Walter Mondale, he won every state except for Mondale’s home state of Minnesota. But that was when the “demographics” of the nation were quite different. If Reagan were alive today, he could never win a forty-nine-state victory. In fact, with the majority of Californians now being of Third World heritage, I venture to say that Reagan couldn’t even win his home state.

Why the groups in question exhibit these voting patterns is grist for a different day. Obviously, no one is born with socialist tendencies, but cultural differences are undeniable. And this is why I have to laugh when I hear conservatives rationalize that they will be able to woo Hispanic voters.

It’s as if they’re ignorant of the political climate in the Third World. Do they ever wonder why socialism and its dark cousin, communism, have long found homes in Mexico and Central and South America? Do they understand that the Mexican Revolution in 1910 was largely socialist in nature and led to the persecution of the Church? Do they realize that Zapatista guerrillas are working to establish socialism in Mexico right now? Does it faze them that socialists Evo Morales and Michelle Bachelet were elected in, respectively, Bolivia and Chile? How about the fact that Marxist Daniel Ortega was just elected in Nicaragua? And then, of course, there’s the pièce de résistance, Fidel Castro’s philosophical and stylistic soul mate, Hugo Chavez of Venezuela.

The fact is that people get the government they deserve because, one way or another, they make the government what it is. And it takes a very special head-in-the-sand kind of naivete to believe that these socialistic immigrants will magically be transformed into lovers of the American way upon touching U.S. terra firma.

What will happen – what is, in fact, happening – is that these newcomers will see a land of milk and honey, one far richer than whence they came, and their redistributive appetites will be whetted all the more. Jorge Bush couldn’t win a majority of Hispanic votes even after rendering a radio address in Spanish to commemorate Cinco De Mayo and compassionately conserving the budget into the stratosphere. What makes anyone think a real conservative ever could?

So, assimilation? It’s a pipe dream. If these new “hard working” immigrants will assimilate into anything, it will be our third millennium culture of entitlement.

As far as the sword of Damocles of amnesty goes, there is a sad irony here. Traditionalist voters were angry at Bush, in part, because he has done little about the invasion of our nation and supports de facto amnesty. The Republican House blocked Bush’s amnesty plan. So, to punish Bush, they voted to end Republican control of the House, thereby removing the only impediment to amnesty and giving Bush exactly what he wants. Good show that, gringos.

But the leftists are euphoric; now they can double the size of one of their voting blocks in one swift, culture-rending blow. It’s as if these seducers importuned you to vault them to power this past election, saying “Vote for us and we’ll respect you in the morning.” You did. They won’t

So, I have no good news for you, traditionalist brethren. Because if you think our fearless leaders aren’t listening to you now, just wait until they naturalize millions more mail-order socialists.

Contact Selwyn Duke

Posted by Selwyn at November 20, 2006 01:32 AM

-->

Comments

Selwyn,

1. Since when was America a white's only nation? 2. Many Asian's coming to America are hardly 3rd world, many of them are brighter than the average "white" American. 3. Perhaps your finally getting a taste of what "native americans" felt when Europeans invaded America and basically took it over for themselves. Now all of a sudden you have a problem when a few of them decide to take it back? What was it I heard the other day, seeing the border issue from the view point of Mexicans along the border. We didn't cross the border, the border moved over us...that's right, California, New Mexico, and Texas and Arizona were all part of Mexico before "we" took it over.

Saw something else the other day that surprised me. 60%+ of Californians when asked about the immigration problem, favored Bush's and the democrats position. Kind of strange don't you think if they saw the problem as an invasion. If anyone should be able to complain it would be Californians...but they realize unlike the rest of us, who picks America's food.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 20, 2006 04:34 PM

No no no, ahmanrah. It's all very simple, really. Here, just put on these blinders, that's right.

Good. Now, pay close attention. Illegal immigrants are law breakers. That's the problem, focus on that. Are you focusing? Stay focused. Now you've got it. C-r-i-m-i-n-a-l-s. That's right. All 15-30 million of those criminals must go. That's the solution. Law broken, kick out the law breakers. Done. No more problem.

Who will pick America's food? You're peeking around those blinders, aren't you? That's not a problem of the law, and we're the party of law and order. That's a problem for farmers. Oh, and if you still think it's a problem? Then you're a terrorist, because leaky borders will allow terrorists in - therefore you must love terrorists, therefore you *are* a terrorist. Quod erat demonstrandum.

Posted by plausible_deniability [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 20, 2006 06:39 PM

PD,

What's so funny is that Selwyn is so blinded by his "anti-Mexican" stance that he doesn't see the opportunity to save the republican party that stares him right in the face. Mexicans are by and large social conservatives. The only reason they vote with the Democrats is because the Democrats have had a better record of looking after their interests. And that's the key...until Republicans get away from the white-only club mentality, their greatest allies among other "socially conservative" groups, will elude them.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 20, 2006 07:06 PM

Very amusing now that I think about it. For one, if Bush pushed Congress to adopt the Senate immigration plan, or something even more lib'ral, say amnesty on a large scale, they quite possibly could have gotten themselves 10+ million new voters over the coming years. Enough to sway future elections.

Instead they waffled, squandered that opportunity ("but... brown skin ... they're Mexicans!"), and here we are with the Dems holding onto a double-barreled Congress. Heh-heh.

The other interesting thing is, you'll never catch an American conservative talking about the other immigration problem: Canadians and Europeans. Caucasians, mostly. NYC is jammed with Irish and Canadian illegals, and a fair number of British, Spanish and Germs, too. Quite a few Haitian and Jamaican too. Not a problem for me, but it's where a lot of bartender, waiting and construction jobs go, here.

Sure, it's the minority percentage of the overall immigration issue, but the hypocrisy of conservatives is exposed for what it is: racism. Let's arm ourselves with semi-auto weapons, head down to the border, and ward off that "invasion." Hey, if you get a chance, check out "30 Days." Season 2, espisode 1 has a Minute Man member living with a family of eight illegal Mexican immigrants for 30 days. Quite, quite telling.

Posted by plausible_deniability [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 20, 2006 07:59 PM

plausible,

you answered your own question but then proceeded to go even farther. No-one is protesting the number of Irish because they in fact are such a small percentage. the vast majority are coming from south of the border.

now on the other hand, would you agree that the Irish bore the brunto of the immigration backlash about 80 years ago like the Mexicans are now?

how is it racism to focus the attention where the problem lies?

and do you know what the US response was 80 years ago to the immigration wave? limit immigration which is exactly what we should do now.

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 27, 2006 05:37 PM

p.s. ahmanrah

who picked America's food before the great immigration wave to the last two decades?

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 27, 2006 05:38 PM

p.s. ahmanrah

who picked America's food before the great immigration wave to the last two decades?

Does it really matter? Whoever was picking them then, isn't picking them now, and neither are their children. Immediately of course your going to say the Mexicans stole jobs. And to that I say crap. Until the day arrives that we pay double for our groceries and don't complain about it, is the day those jobs be come competitive. And that goes for pickers in America, coffee growers in Ethiopa and Indonesia, and where ever labor is exploited to give us cheap food, cheap clothes, and cheap electronics.

So you have a choice, complain about Mexicans and foreigners stealing jobs and ruining America, or pay them along with everyone else what they are worth, and become a little less "wealthy" yourself. You decide.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 27, 2006 11:58 PM

ahmanrah,

I do not ever recall lettuce pickers being a high paying job, before the immigration wave or after.

if vegetables became costly because of high wages in the US, we would begin to import more lettuce rather than pay double for it. that is how the market works.

food costs have always been low in the US due to a sound and diverse agricultural industry

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2006 01:58 PM

"And to that I say crap."

Oh, that's what you say to everything. In fact, it's all you ever say.

"Until the day arrives that we pay double for our groceries and don't complain about it, is the day those jobs be come competitive."

Well, maybe you have a shot at that. After all, we're paying about five times as much for coffee as we ever imagined ten years ago!

"And that goes for pickers in America, coffee growers in Ethiopa and Indonesia, and where ever labor is exploited to give us cheap food, cheap clothes, and cheap electronics."

No cheap coffee, though.

Rats.

Posted by Kerry [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2006 02:31 PM

Kerry,

Question is, who are you paying the extra money for coffee to? The growers, or starbucks? Do you even know. There is a new documentary coming out that digs into the reality of the industry. Starbucks didn't want to talk to anybody on camera, until they knew the shit was about to hit the fan. Out comes the spin machine.

if vegetables became costly because of high wages in the US, we would begin to import more lettuce rather than pay double for it

Do you think maybe reason we aren't importing so are vegetables is because they have been able to keep prices low with illegal migrant labor? Again, the reasons Americans aren't picking the vegetables is because nobody wants the job. The day someone legal wants the job is the day the job goes overseas. So people should stop whining about migrant farm workers stealing jobs, until the day arrives that they are willing to pay the higher prices required to attract legal workers.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2006 08:25 PM

yes, that is correct. food is cheap. however, farm workers certainly aren't the only industry where illegals have taken over. look at the construction industry and a multitude of service industry jobs. raise the minimum wage and watch as the incentive to come to the US is even greater. 2 dollars more an hour!! ay chihuahua!! increase the wages for farm workers and you will attract more illegals than legals.

food will remain cheap regardless of the illegals here. if the price gets too expensive, it will imported or people will not buy it plain and simple.

you can buy an expresso in say Colombia or the Dominican Republic or Argentina for say 50 to 75 cents. the same drink at Starbucks is about $3.00 or $4.00

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 28, 2006 09:20 PM

raise the minimum wage and watch as the incentive to come to the US is even greater. 2 dollars more an hour!! ay chihuahua!! increase the wages for farm workers and you will attract more illegals than legals.

Ben,

That might be true, but I think some Americans would still have a problem if the immigrants were legal. People finger the immigrants as the problem, but really the problem is the companies that hire them, and the governments that don't enforce rules already on the books. Alot of the businesses working with illegals are shady as it is, all you have to see are a few programs on how those workers are treated (conditions mind you that no American would put up with).

That comes back to my original point, if the companies brought legal aliens into America, and the same problem occured, would you still have a problem with them stealing jobs. Is this situation really any different than shipping car and electronics manufactoring overseas?

Eventually the United States has to realize on some level that it has priced its labor out of the market. And the only way to solve that is to cut the standard of living, tax imports through the roof (protectionism never works), or make sure that America's population is so educated that the only people who qualify for America's jobs are Americans. We're not doing a very good job of that on to fronts. A college education is overpriced, and our primary education is increasingly becoming the laugh stock of the world, because of lack of leadership, accountability, and efficient spending of resources.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 12:24 AM

ahmanrah,

why do you need a PhD to get a job getting picking broccoli? I don't get your post.

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 09:17 AM

Waaaaaaaa....waaaaaa...waaaaaa.....who's gonna pick the produce?????? Call a waaaaaambulance!!!!!

Hint: We have a nice American way of inventing machines to replace workers.....when we are forced to invent those machines due to a lack of cheap labor. Nice big tree-fruit picking machines that have been developed, eh? Or haven't you seen the specials on the history channel about, due to the lack of illegals to pick certain ftuits, the dreaded farm machinery industry made huge machines that drive over trees, shake the shit outta 'em and collect the fruit all without illegal immigrants in the process?

Go on....whine about the irrelevant issue of "Who's gonna pick our food"......

Go on....point to the Irish. If they're here illegally, I want them just as deported as anyone else here illegally. Oops...there go the completely empty racism claims.

Posted by Sarge [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 09:42 AM

You know, if they really wanted to, most Americans could grow their own vegetables.

Meat, they need help with. But vegetables wouldn't be that tough to be subsistent in (especially at my house, where nobody wants them, anyway.)

Posted by Kerry [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 09:56 AM

I love it when the ignorant point to the Irish (who pick no produce) and only the "produce pickers" of the south of the border illegals.........and ignore that illegals are taking jobs that the Americans DO want. Boston doesn't HAVE a produce picking world, but we've got plenty of illegals and they're not cleaning bathrooms, they're stealing construction jobs from hard-working Americans. Roofers, plumbers, carpenters, finishers, drywallers, painters.......these are the Americans that're losing.

Who's rebuilding New Orleans? Who's building all the new developments in southwest Florida? Illegals...stealing jobs that Americans will do.

Pay no attention to the man behind the curtain stealing construction jobs. AAAAAAAARGH!!!! Look at the price of lettuce!!!!!!!

Posted by Sarge [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 11:02 AM

Sarge,

Illegals aren't the problem, its the people giving them the jobs.

As far as inventing a machine for every type of vegetable. I suspect if it could be done, it would be done. Somethings you can't just shake the shit out of and get a product people will buy.

And somehow given your tone I suspect you'd have a problem with legal aliens stealing American jobs.

Kerry,

I'd like to see you grow an entire years worth of vegetables on a 1/4 acre lot or less, which is what most Americans have. And where are American's going to bother finding the time, they'd probably higher an illegal to tend their yards...some already do.

BenRhodes,

My comment about PHD's was that some jobs America will not be able to protect, giving our high cost of living. So the only way we are going to stay competitive is train people for advanced jobs that nobody else in the world has the skills to do.

Posted by ahmanrah [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 29, 2006 07:13 PM

Ahmanrah,

there aren't enough high tech jobs available for all americans. besides, business would simply start moving them to India anyway to lower labor costs.

allowing unimpeded immigration into the country to totally take over the construction industry for example is certainly not the answer.

Posted by BenRhodes [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 30, 2006 08:24 AM

Ahmanrah,

You can grow enough vegetables to eat for yourself in a container in an apartment. Try not trying to grow a whole year's worth at once. It can be done.

"If it could be done, it would be done"--there's your good old American ingenuity, huh?

"My comment about PHD's was that some jobs America will not be able to protect, giving our high cost of living."

Like what? We're not losing PhD jobs. We're producing too many PhD's.

"So the only way we are going to stay competitive is train people for advanced jobs that nobody else in the world has the skills to do."

Let's think about that for a minute. When have we ever done that? It that what Bill Gates did? No one in the world except Bill Gates had the skills to invent what he invented? Which he got by dropping out of (or being thrown out of, depending on who you talk to) college? No. It wasn't some unique SKILL. It was his ingenuity.

What about Sam Walton? Did he have skills that no one else in the world could have duplicated? He opened a GROCERY STORE, for goodness' sake! Nobody "trained" him for that--"we" sure didn't!

And how about Ted Turner? Did he have skills no one else in the world had? No.

We don't need to train people to do what NO ONE ELSE IN THE WORLD can do. We need to train them to do what EVERYONE else in the world can do, then get out of their way and let them figure out how to do it BETTER.

80% of American jobs are service jobs. So what? America's has been built by people who realized that they didn't just want a "job." They wanted to run their own business, do something better than anyone else, create something new--and that's never going to be the vast majority of people. It's always going to be a few people, who provide work for the vast majority.

If you want a better job, make one. It's not easy, and (from personal experience) it can take multiple tries. And while you're doing it, you may have to take a lot of jobs you don't want to do. But you just keep going.

And you don't blame the economy, or the president, or the people who are doing better than you. They are not your enemy--they should be your role models.

Posted by Kerry [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 30, 2006 09:11 AM

Speaking of immigration:

Take note of the unexpected popularity of the show "Ugly Betty." And watch this--her heroic father was just revealed to be not only an illegal immigrant, but one who murdered a man in his home country (the abusive husband of the woman he ran off with and married). Culturally, it will be very interesting to see how they handle this story arc--and how the audience reacts.

Another culture note on the immigration question. You may be familiar with "Dora the Explorer," the somewhat odd children's show in which a computer game character has adventures and teaches children Spanish. Now her friend "Diego" has spun off his own show. And there's a new addition to the Hispanic cartoon world, "Handy Manny," about a Hispanic repairman and his talking tools. Responding to a need, or attempting to create one?

Posted by Kerry [TypeKey Profile Page] at November 30, 2006 09:45 AM