« Camouflage Deemed Racist | Main | Where There's Smoke, There's Government Intrusion »

April 01, 2009

Sodomy Education May Be Mandated in California Public Schools

A bill pending in the California State Senate would require that textbooks purchased by the California education bureaucracy contain information about the sexual deviance of some historical figures:

Sacramento, CA – A bill before California State Senate that would require California schools to teach students about the contributions gay people have made to society is an essential step toward ending the battle of homophobia, supporters say.

A Senate committee passed the bill Thursday, which would require schools to buy textbooks “accurately” portraying “the sexual diversity of our society."

Additionally, students would learn of the contributions LGBT people have made to the social development of California and the United States of America.

Though the bill is strictly intended for California, it could have far-reaching implications. As the nation’s largest sate and largest textbook buyer, California often sets the standards for publishers who sell nationwide.

But as expected, reaction to the bill is mixed, with some arguing that the issue of sexual orientation has no place in the classroom, according to reports by the Associated Press.

“We're totally opposed to inserting sexual orientation into textbooks in our schools,” Karen England, executive director of the public-policy group Capital Resource Institute, told the Associated Press. “This is more than just accepting it, it's forcing our kids to embrace it, almost celebrate it.

Amen to that! What only a couple decades ago would have been considered ludicrous by nearly everyone -- teaching about the sexual deviance of historical figures -- is now close to becoming law in California.

As far as “accurately” portraying “the sexual diversity of our society.", whether or not a person is a sexual deviant has no bearing on what they may or may not have accomplished of historical significance. Last time I checked, school was supposed to be all about reading, math, science and history, not "sexual diversity", which is leftist doublespeak for sexual deviance. Does it really matter that George Washington liked girls or that Abraham Lincoln may have liked guys? These facts and conjecture are of no historical significance whatsoever.

The one thing of significance this legislation DOES do is throw the door the sexual deviants now have their foot in wide open to celebrate the fact of their deviance in the public schools under the guise of "education" and that is exactly the point:

In contrast, the bill's author, Democratic Sen. Sheila Kuehl, rejects the criticism.

“We've been working since 1995 to try to improve the climate in schools for gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender kids, as well as those kids who are just thought to be gay, because there is an enormous amount of harassment and discrimination at stake,” she said.

Kuehl says research indicates that the inclusion of a balanced and accurate gay history in school points might help LGBT students to do better in school and be less at risk for suicide, truancy or drug and alcohol abuse.

The idea that there is such a thing as "gay, lesbian, bi-sexual and trans-gender kids" is a farce. There are a whole bunch of sexually conflicted teens that are being worked over by the sodomy lobby and their willing accomplices and this legislation simply furthers their goals. Finally, if we're going to tell the story of "gay history", let's tell the whole story: The story of how decadence and corruption of all kinds, including rampant sodomy, precipitated the downfall of previous great civilizations.

Posted by Steve at April 1, 2009 12:00 AM

-->

Comments

Well, as ridiculous as the idea sounds, I'd have to see the list of famous people we're talking about. I do, in fact, think that the psychological makeup of individuals is an interesting and important part of their history--perhaps not at the elementary school level, though.

For example, I think it is important to know in studying them that Truman Capote, Tennessee Williams, and Oscar Wilde were gay. Knowing the sexual perversities of Tiberius and Caligula in no way celebrates them for it; rather, it emphasizes the monstrousness of their conduct. I think it adds to our understanding of the agony he felt over the Civil War to know that Lincoln is thought by many medical historians to have been a depressive. History is enriched by knowing more about the personalities of the people who made it. That's what the genre of biography is all about.

But before we start randomly assigning sexual orientation, I'd like to ses some evidence for the (you'll excuse the expression) assignment. Don't just hand me a list of people somebody claims were gay (Moses, Edison, William Randolph Hearst, Marilyn Monroe, Daniel Boone, whoever.) Tell me how you know. Then tell me why it's relevant. For instance, it would certainly be important to know that, say, Freud was gay. But would it be relevant that, hypothetically, Eli Whitney was? Can't imagine how.

By all means, let's "accurately" portray the contributions of sexually diverse people in society. But I'm not sure the people backing the legislation will like what they find.

Posted by Kerry [TypeKey Profile Page] at April 9, 2006 11:49 PM