« Abortion, Authority, and Responsibility | Main | Frontline News: Iraqi Children To Get Better Teacher-to-Student Interaction »
March 16, 2006
Nine Trillion with a "T"
Most of us middle class slobs slugging it out in the trenches have a hard time comprehending $9 million or $9 billion, let alone $9 trillion, but $9 trillion is the amount the U.S. Senate just raised your debt ceiling and mine to: Thirty grand apiece for every man, woman and child in the U.S.:
WASHINGTON (AFX) - The Senate voted Thursday to let the federal government add another $781 billion in debt to the nation's balance sheet, boosting the federal debt limit to nearly $9 trillionThe crucial measure, which marks the fourth increase in the debt limit over the past five years, cleared the chamber on a narrow 52-48 vote. The final legislative action came just days before the federal government risked default on some of its borrowing obligations
"I commend Congress for protecting the full faith and credit of the United States with today's action on the debt limit. This legislation ensures that the U.S. can deliver on promises already made, such as Social Security and Medicare payments and aid for the victims of the 2005 hurricanes," said Treasury Secretary John Snow, in a written statement
The House previously approved the increase. It now goes to the White House for President Bush's signature
Democrats used the debate on the must-pass measure to bash Bush's fiscal policies
"Any objective analysis of our country's fiscal history would have to conclude this administration and this rubber-stamping Republican Congress are the most fiscally irresponsible in the history of our country," said Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev
Democrats charge that the Bush administration's tax cuts have been skewed toward wealthy Americans while boosting the deficit. The White House and Republican leaders contend that the nine-month 2001 recession and the aftermath of the Sept. 11, 2001, terror attacks have played a major role in persistent deficits
Few Republicans took the floor to voice support for the boost in the debt limit
Sen. Tom Coburn, R-Okla., argued Wednesday night that it was incorrect to blame Bush for the rising debt, saying that both parties in Congress were responsible. "The responsibility lies in the Congress for spending," Coburn said. Coburn joined Republicans John Ensign of Nevada and Conrad Burns of Montana in voting against the increase, along with 44 Democrats and one independent
Snow had previously warned that the government had bumped up against the existing debt ceiling and would run out of room to maneuver as early as next week without congressional action
Snow wrote lawmakers late Wednesday, pleading with the Senate to approve the increase without any amendments that would force the measure to return to the House
In a letter to Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist, R-Tenn., Snow urged lawmakers "in the strongest possible terms" to raise the amount of money the government can borrow. Failure to increase the limit would threaten "the full faith and credit of the United States government," Snow wrote
The Senate complied, defeating a lone amendment offered by Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., that would have required the Treasury Department to analyze the national-security implications of foreign holdings of U.S. debt
The debt ceiling was raised to $8.184 trillion in 2004. Under an agreement by Senate leaders, the debt-limit debate came in the middle of action on the Senate's $2.77 trillion budget resolution for fiscal 2007. After the debt-limit vote, the Senate returned to the budget plan. The Senate will vote on remaining amendments, with a final vote on the non-binding outline set for Thursday afternoon. The final vote on the resolution is expected to be close. Republicans may seek to have Vice President Dick Cheney on hand in the event of a tie vote. Under the constitution, the vice president presides over the Senate, casting the deciding vote in the event of a tie
Dirty Harry Reid's attempt to hang the "fiscally irresponsible" moniker on Republicans is a load of crap. As Tom Coburn rightly pointed out, both parties are to blame for the out of control government spending that necessitated this debt-limit increase and had the treasury secretary groveling at the feet of senators "pleading" for this increase to save the government from defaulting on some of its debt obligations. Like one of us middle class slobs borrowing from one credit card to pay off another, this does nothing to actually solve the real problem and, in fact, makes it exponentially worse. It would be better for the federal government to default on some of its debt obligations. If they did, the spineless Washington political whores might actually have to come up with a plan to DEAL with the problem instead of putting it off on our kids and their kids.
As far as the root of the REAL problem that got us where we are, the blame can be laid squarely at the feet of the Democrats and the welfare state they erected piece by piece beginning in the mid-30's with that scam they call "Social Security". The Great Society War on Poverty, started by Johnson in the mid-60s did absolutely nothing to eradicate poverty, created an underclass of slothful slobs whose "welfare" is funded by the taxpayer and has created the multi-trillion debt mess we face today. Projected to cost $9 billion in 1990 when first conceived, the actual cost of this wasteful behemoth was $109 billion -- and that was better than a decade and a half ago.
Thanks to the Democrats we have a $40+ trillion unfunded liability in Social Security and thanks to George W. Bush, we just created a $20 trillion unfunded liability that, among other things, helps grandpa achieve an erection providing he can figure out how to use it (the program, not the stiffy). There is plenty of blame to go around but Republicans have come to the spending party just recently. For Democrats, out of control spending is their legacy.
The damnable lies of the Democrats regarding taxes and deficits only serve to further obfuscate any attempts to cut spending and increase revenues to the treasury through tax cuts. The first of these is Dirty Harry's notion that Bush's "tax cuts for the rich" (funny, I'm sure as hell not rich and I got one) contributed to the deficit problem. In fact, tax revenues of late have increased dramatically due to the increased economic activity generated by allowing people to keep more of their own money to spend and invest. An example of this is the 45% increase in capital gains revenues to the treasury as a result of the 25% reduction in the capital gains tax by the Bush Administration in 2003. Kennedy proved it in the 60s, Reagan proved it in the 80s and Bush is proving it again: Tax cuts actually INCREASE tax revenues thereby reducing deficits. The problem has always been that the tax cuts and revenue increases haven't been accompanied by corresponding ACTUAL CUTS in government spending.
The cutting government spending is the other damnable lie nearly all Democrats tell: no federal budget line item ever suffers an actual real decrease unless you're talking about defense spending under a Democrat administration. Democrats love to whine and complain about decreases in the rate of growth of their precious social programs as if conservatives who want REAL cuts in government spending are ready to throw grandma and grandpa into the gutter with a paper bag rather than fund their Social Security or literally steal food from the school lunch program out of the mouths of babes. As long as this dishonesty on the subject of government spending, tax cuts and the deficit is allowed to continue, we will get nowhere and John Snow will be right back in front of the senate two years from now begging them to increase the debt ceiling to $10 trillion.
President Bush's biggest triumph has been his ability to get real tax relief to the American people. His biggest failure has been an appetite for out of control government spending not seen since Johnson's "Great Society" in the 60s. We've got to stop mortgaging the future of our kids and grandkids by continuing to allow ourselves to go deeper and deeper into debt and the only way to do this is through real spending cuts combined with making the Bush tax cuts permanent and cutting taxes even more.
Posted by Steve at March 16, 2006 06:37 PM
Copyright © 2007 by author. May not be copied, published, or otherwise used (except for brief quotes) without express permission of author. Articles published with permission by Pardon My English.
-->Comments
I don't think your closest neo-con aquaintances will agree with this ignorance. I think SF has referred to this whale and I suggest you don't follow Oregons' method of removing it.
Posted by Russ
at March 17, 2006 11:25 AM
Tax cuts actually INCREASE tax revenues thereby reducing deficits.
Maybe you should cut them to zero and revenues will become...infinite? Yes, this is a facile question, but so is your equation. Surely there is some sweet spot before we hit zero? Think about what you're saying, man!
I suspect this long diatribe about how it's all the democrats' fault (*snooze*) is motivated partly by this post, and my comment that follows:
http://www.pardonmyenglish.com/archives/2006/03/i_see_the_stock.html
Both hands need to talk to each other here. Are these two things (stock market rise and debt ceiling rise) related? No matter, it's all the democrats' fault. If the market rises, that's the president. If the debt ceiling rises, that's the party that's out of power.
So is Aaron going to admit that democrats had something to do with the stock market raise or is Steve going to admit that the republicans had something to do with the debt ceiling raise? I expect to either see no comment or some spectacular gymnastics.
By the way, is it surprising that the capital gains tax revenues are higher at the same time that the market is up? Ah, but let me guess, this stock market raise has NOTHING to do with lots of foreign lending, in the form of T-bill purchases. by the Chinese government (especially). Try not to look at the whole picture at the same time if you want to hold onto your clarity. Best to pick and choose pleasing facts.
Posted by Some Fella
at March 18, 2006 05:42 AM
Hmm: a Republican congress votes to increase the debt limit nearly a trillion dollars, to be signed off on by a Republican president, and it is still somehow all the Democrats fault. Nothing but stories and excuses to read here -shameful coming from members of the fiscal "responsibility" party, really.
And check out the new math: Cuts in tax revenue bring increases in tax revenue! That one's a keeper for the moonbat voodoo economics award. Both George the senior and junior must be toasting their Wall St. buddies, all the fresh cabbage they're raking in on the federal debt being sold on freshly inked scrim! Makes me wish I still worked there, coz bonus time this year will be a record payday (though not nearly as good as if Soc.Sec. had been privatized.) The interest on this one alone will probably double the payout to debt-holders.
At the end of the tax year, the bottom-line math says it all: record red ink spilling all over, signed off on by a smiling Republican President, and a proud Republican Congress. They've always enjoyed doing the good works of transferring greenbacks from working peoples' pockets into the wallets of the rich. And Republican voters still buy this load of manure - just amazing.
Makes me glad I run my own business, I won't be one of the victimized taxpayers who have to pay for this astounding foolishness. Best democracy money can buy.
Posted by plausible_deniability
at March 18, 2006 05:11 PM
It's called the Laffer curve. Yes, there is a sweet spot before we hit 0.
Plausible ....what have the democrats done? Nothing? Huh.
Every time a measure comes up to vote, to eliminate pork or reduce spending, how do democrats vote? Huh....
That's what I thought.
When democrats start voting AGAINST republicans and with Tom Coburn (and a select few others) they can claim fiscal sanity.
Until then, beleive whatever the hell you want, but I'm not buying that bullshit.
Posted by MJohnson
at March 20, 2006 08:25 AM
Note: Comments once posted become the property of Pardon My English. We therefore reserve the right to make use of such in any manner and for whatever purpose we deem appropriate. Please refer to comment policy for further information.


